or summary. If so, what should my next sentence be? For example, if a writer is passionate about arguing for or against the. Sometimes, the logical connection, the way in which a fact logically supports a claim, will be clear, possibly so clear that no explanation from the writer is needed. You may have heard the redundant phrase dryden essay on dramatic poetry summary "true facts." The phrase is redundant because all facts are true: that's what makes them facts.
On the subject you are discussing and support that position with evidence. In fact, if you make a claim or an argument without evidence, your paper could. Evidence is the facts, examples, or sources used to support a claim. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms data collected from surveys, and lab.
For example, if the writer is arguing that a certain amendment to the state constitution should be passed, it is probably necessary to describe what changes the amendment would make and whether or not a similar amendment has been proposed at some point. Thoreau believed that preoccupation with insignificant events caused nineteenth-century Americans to overlook what is important in life. One of the best places to use pathos is in the introduction. Instead, you could reread the information from the text carefully and then summarize the writer's points, perhaps using only a few sentences to convey an idea that the writer develops in a page or more. Most likely, I will repeat this same pattern with a different claim, but one related to my first claim. With the warrant, I try to bring together the claim and evidence, demonstrating to readers how and why the evidence logically supports the claim. It may be possible to argue for or against one portion of the law. Provide the necessary background information on the topic. Most likely, the next sentence will use another piece of supporting evidence from Thoreau's essay, followed by my explanation of how this evidence supports the claim. For more on creating a thesis statement, view the thesis statements page.